美联储百年独立保卫战！特朗普欲解雇库克受阻？

Core Viewpoint - The case regarding the dismissal of Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook by former President Trump represents a significant confrontation over the balance of power between the presidency and the independence of the Federal Reserve, with potential long-term implications for U.S. economic policy [2][9]. Group 1: Case Background - The Supreme Court is hearing arguments for the first time since the Federal Reserve's establishment in 1913 regarding a president's attempt to dismiss an official [2]. - Trump's dismissal of Cook was based on allegations of "mortgage fraud," which Cook denied, stating that the actions occurred before her tenure at the Federal Reserve [4]. - The case has progressed through lower courts, with a district court ruling that Trump's actions violated constitutional due process, leading to Cook's continued tenure [5]. Group 2: Legal Arguments - Key issues in the Supreme Court hearing include whether pre-appointment behavior can justify dismissal, whether Cook's actions constitute "fraud" or "innocent mistakes," and whether presidential dismissal decisions require judicial review [6]. - The Deputy Attorney General argued that the president has the authority to determine dismissal reasons without due process, while Cook's legal team contended that her actions were not fraudulent and that the government's stance threatens the Federal Reserve's independence [6]. Group 3: Judicial Perspectives - Supreme Court justices expressed skepticism towards the government's position, with concerns that it could undermine the Federal Reserve's independence and allow for arbitrary dismissals based on trivial or unverifiable claims [7]. - The justices highlighted the importance of due process in dismissals, questioning the validity of using social media for such announcements [7]. Group 4: Implications of the Ruling - The outcome of the case will have profound implications for the independence of the Federal Reserve and the potential for presidential overreach in monetary policy [10][11]. - A ruling in favor of Cook would reinforce the boundaries of presidential power over the Federal Reserve, while a ruling in favor of Trump could jeopardize the traditional independence of the central bank, potentially leading to increased economic volatility [10].