打响撤资美股第一枪？格陵兰养老基金仍考虑减持美股

Core Viewpoint - The Greenland Pension Fund is considering whether to continue investing in U.S. stocks as a symbolic resistance to President Trump's attempts to control Greenland [1][2] Group 1: Fund's Investment Strategy - The SISA pension fund manages approximately 7 billion Danish kroner (about 1.1 billion USD) and currently has about 50% exposure to the U.S. market, primarily in public equities [1] - The fund's board and investment committee are discussing the pros and cons of divesting from U.S. assets, with CEO Søren Schock Petersen indicating that a decision may be made in the future [1][2] - If the fund decides to divest from U.S. assets, it would represent a significant shift, given the importance of the U.S. stock market, which comprises about 70% of the MSCI World Index [2] Group 2: Market Reactions and Implications - Some European pension funds have already announced plans to sell U.S. government bonds, but have not fully exited the stock market [2] - The CEO acknowledged that the fund's holdings in U.S. government bonds are minimal, and selling U.S. stocks would have limited actual impact on the U.S. capital markets [2] - Petersen raised concerns about the fairness of divesting, questioning whether fund members would support the decision if U.S. stocks continue to perform well [2] Group 3: Potential Risks and Concerns - Petersen mentioned the "worst-case scenario" of a U.S. military invasion, which could lead to significant implications for the fund's investments in Greenland, including a recent acquisition of a local seafood company [3] - He expressed uncertainty about whether the fund's assets would be confiscated by the U.S. in the event of an invasion, stating that while it is unlikely, there are no guarantees [3] Group 4: Fund Background - SISA pension fund was established in 1999 and is collectively owned by over 44,000 members, with its main office located in Nuuk and currently employs six staff members [4] - The CEO noted that compared to other institutions in the industry, the fund is relatively small, but a decision to divest from U.S. assets could carry symbolic significance [4]