特朗普启动“和平委员会”，10亿美元永久入会，欧洲多国拒绝加入，泽连斯基：很难想象与俄方共事

Core Viewpoint - The United States has initiated a "Peace Committee" aimed at overseeing the governance transition in Gaza, with participation from various countries, but has faced skepticism and rejection from several European allies and concerns about its implications for the United Nations [1][2][4][6]. Group 1: Formation and Structure of the Peace Committee - The "Peace Committee" was signed into existence by representatives from over a dozen countries, including Mongolia, Argentina, and Uzbekistan, but notably excluded representatives from Palestine and Israel [1]. - The committee's founding executive members include prominent figures such as President Trump, Secretary of State Rubio, and Jared Kushner, with a term of three years for member countries, which can be extended by contributing over $1 billion [2][8]. - Approximately 60 countries and international organizations have been invited to join the committee, with notable mentions including France, Germany, and Italy [2]. Group 2: Reactions from Global Leaders - Several European leaders, including French President Macron and Norwegian Prime Minister, have declined to join the committee, citing concerns over its authority and potential to undermine the UN framework [4][5][6]. - Italy's Prime Minister Meloni expressed the need for more time to evaluate the proposal, while Sweden and Slovenia also indicated their reluctance to participate [5][6]. - Some countries, such as Canada and Japan, have shown cautious interest, with Canada agreeing in principle but still discussing details [5][6]. Group 3: Concerns and Criticisms - The committee's proposed structure has raised questions, particularly regarding Trump's extensive decision-making power and the stipulation that countries contributing $1 billion gain permanent membership [9][10]. - Critics argue that the committee lacks legitimacy and institutional foundation, with concerns that it may not effectively address the rights and interests of Palestinians [10][11]. - The overall perception is that the initiative could weaken the authority of the United Nations and create a parallel diplomatic framework [1][3][9].