从格陵兰到高关税：欧洲“离不开”美国了吗？难以招架美国压力？

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the geopolitical struggle between the US and the EU over Greenland, highlighting a shift in transatlantic relations [1][13] - The US is applying pressure through tariffs to gain special rights in Greenland, while the EU's response is characterized by strong rhetoric but weak actions [3][9] - The EU's economic dependency on the US, with a bilateral trade volume exceeding €700 billion annually, limits its ability to respond effectively to US threats [3] Group 2 - Greenland holds significant strategic value for the US due to its rich mineral resources, including world-class rare earth deposits and potential oil and gas reserves [6][8] - The control of Arctic shipping routes is becoming increasingly important, with Greenland positioned at a critical juncture for future Eurasian trade [8] - The US aims to secure resource development rights and influence over shipping regulations rather than territorial annexation, thereby consolidating its strategic advantage [8] Group 3 - The EU's internal divisions, stemming from the differing interests of its 27 member states regarding Arctic affairs, hinder a unified response to US pressure [5] - The most likely outcome is that the EU will make substantive concessions while maintaining a facade of sovereignty, seeking a "face-saving" resolution [9][11] - Potential concessions may include granting resource development rights to US companies, yielding rule-making authority in Arctic negotiations, and tacitly allowing an expanded US military presence in Greenland [11]