特朗普外交新常态：绕过国会，重大决策均由“亲信圈子”敲定

Group 1 - The meeting between officials from the US, Denmark, and Greenland was initially calm, with no discussions about military or financial takeover of Greenland [1] - The appointment of Jeff Landry as a special envoy for Greenland by President Trump and his subsequent statements about making Greenland part of the US surprised officials in Copenhagen and within the US government [1] - Trump's foreign policy approach has been characterized by a lack of consultation with traditional national security officials, leading to erratic policy decisions [1][2] Group 2 - The centralization of decision-making in Trump's administration has raised concerns about the potential long-term damage to relationships with key allies [2] - White House officials, including Stephen Miller, have emphasized the possibility of military action regarding Greenland, causing confusion and alarm among US allies [3] - Despite the rhetoric, military action against Greenland was reportedly never seriously considered [4] Group 3 - Trump's threats regarding Greenland have damaged the US's credibility among its closest allies, as noted by former Pentagon and White House officials [5] - The US already has a military presence in Greenland under a treaty with Denmark, which allows for the expansion of its operations there [5] Group 4 - Trump's approach to foreign policy has consistently marginalized experts and centralized decision-making among trusted allies, as seen in various international negotiations [6] - This pattern has also been evident in US policy towards Syria, where key decisions were made without input from traditional policy advisors [7]