关税威胁突然撤回，欧洲内部陷入分歧：该对美国强硬还是妥协？

Core Points - The European Parliament has postponed the decision on unfreezing the US-EU trade agreement but hinted that it may pass later [1] - There was a lack of consensus among senior trade lawmakers after a two-and-a-half-hour closed-door meeting regarding whether to put the transatlantic agreement to a vote [1] - The postponement follows President Trump's withdrawal of threats regarding Greenland, which led some EU countries to call for lifting the blockade [1] Group 1 - The Social Democratic Party member, Katharina van Brempt, emphasized the need for clarity on Trump's claims regarding NATO agreements before proceeding with the trade deal [1] - The approval process for the agreement was frozen after Trump threatened tariffs on European allies supporting Greenland [1] - The chair of the European Parliament's International Trade Committee, Bernd Lange, stated that chief negotiators will meet on February 4 to decide on the next steps [1] Group 2 - The center-right European People's Party is eager to "move forward as quickly as possible," believing it will create more stability for businesses [3] - The right-wing European Conservatives and Reformists group, along with the far-right Identity and Democracy group, also support continuing the agreement's progress [3] - In contrast, the Socialists, Renew Europe, and the Greens advocate for a tougher stance, seeking more details on the Greenland agreement due to concerns over Trump's unpredictability [3] Group 3 - Social Democratic member van Brempt expressed the need to understand the European Commission's position on using its strongest trade weapon, the anti-coercion tool [3] - There was discussion among lawmakers about formally requesting the European Commission to initiate the first phase of the anti-coercion tool, but no majority support was formed [3] - A senior trade official from the European Commission indicated a desire to accelerate the agreement's progress following Trump's change in stance [3]