就医被拦、乘车受阻，电动轮椅使用者：花了7年走出家门，现在又被“打”回去

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by electric wheelchair users in accessing public spaces such as hospitals and transportation due to safety concerns related to lithium batteries, highlighting the need for clearer regulations and standards in the industry [1][11][16]. Group 1: Safety Concerns and Regulations - Electric wheelchairs are often prohibited in hospitals and public transport due to fears of lithium battery risks, leading to significant accessibility issues for elderly and disabled users [1][3][4]. - Current standards for electric wheelchairs and their batteries are not mandatory, allowing companies to choose whether to comply, which raises concerns about safety and quality [1][13]. - The Chinese government is in the process of developing mandatory national standards for electric wheelchairs, which would enforce safety regulations and potentially improve user access [2][15]. Group 2: User Experiences and Challenges - Users like Su and Liang have reported difficulties in using electric wheelchairs in hospitals and on public transport, often having to resort to less suitable alternatives like manual wheelchairs [3][5][9]. - The article highlights the emotional and physical challenges faced by users when navigating these restrictions, emphasizing the need for more inclusive policies [10][16]. - There is a growing recognition that electric wheelchairs are essential for many users, and the current restrictions can be seen as barriers to healthcare and mobility [4][16]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest that the government should enhance technical standards for electric wheelchairs, similar to those for electric bicycles, and establish a market entry system for compliant products [14]. - There is a call for proactive governance, including community surveys and the establishment of charging facilities in public areas to ensure safety and accessibility [14]. - The article advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes both safety and the rights of users, arguing against blanket bans that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations [11][16].