最高检：进一步深化和规范检务公开，公开为常态、不公开为例外

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) aims to deepen and standardize judicial transparency, ensuring the public's rights to know, participate, express, and supervise, with a commitment to making transparency the norm and non-disclosure the exception [1][2]. Group 1: Key Arrangements for 2026 - The SPP will actively integrate into the national work agenda, fulfilling its prosecutorial functions to support high-quality economic and social development through four main services [1]. - The focus will be on legal supervision, maintaining high-quality case handling, and promoting the construction of a higher-level socialist rule of law, emphasizing three areas of focus and one strengthening [1][2]. Group 2: Strengthening Internal Construction - The SPP will enhance its internal construction to improve its ability to serve economic and social development, focusing on political construction, capability enhancement, and strict governance [2]. - A development plan for the "14th Five-Year Plan" period is being organized, with a national meeting planned to discuss the future five years of prosecutorial work [2]. Group 3: Judicial Transparency Initiatives - Since 2010, the SPP has held 49 open days to promote judicial transparency and social supervision, with recent themes focusing on the implementation of the Civil Code and juvenile protection [3]. - The SPP regularly publishes case handling information related to public concerns, such as personal information violations and environmental pollution, to enhance public awareness [3][4]. Group 4: Class Case Disclosure - Since 2020, the SPP has released 22 batches of 58 types of cases, with 4 batches and 11 types released in 2025, highlighting legal risks and guiding behavior norms [4]. - Class case disclosures serve as a means to reflect the SPP's responsibilities and commitment to justice, particularly in areas like ecological protection and cultural heritage [4]. Group 5: Future Directions - The SPP will continue to deepen and standardize judicial transparency, enhancing the breadth, precision, and depth of disclosures to better meet public expectations for fairness and justice [5].