偷运核心AI技术赴美换140亿？商务部精准出击，彻底打碎黄粱梦

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese AI unicorn attempted to relocate to Silicon Valley through a shell company in Singapore, but was halted by the Ministry of Commerce, resulting in the collapse of a $14 billion acquisition deal [1][3]. Group 1: Acquisition Attempt and Regulatory Response - The Ministry of Commerce intervened decisively, indicating that the acquisition was not just a commercial dispute but a significant regulatory issue [3][12]. - The Manus team believed that relocating their headquarters to Singapore would allow them to sever ties with China, but this was a miscalculation in the face of regulatory scrutiny [3][10]. - The acquisition was complicated by the requirement from Silicon Valley venture capital firm Benchmark, which demanded a complete separation from Chinese identity for a $75 million investment [5]. Group 2: Data and Technology Ownership - The core technology and data were developed in China, making it impossible to change the "nationality" of the technology, as it is considered "deemed export" under Chinese law [16][20]. - The Ministry of Commerce's assessment focused on whether data was being illegally exported and whether technology was being transferred without compliance [20][22]. - The case highlights the importance of data sovereignty and the principle of technology origin, which cannot be circumvented by merely changing the company's registration location [24][26]. Group 3: Implications for the Industry - The incident serves as a warning to venture capitalists that the previous model of investing in projects with the intent to sell to foreign entities is no longer viable, especially for projects involving core technology and significant data [36]. - The era of opportunistic arbitrage is over, and companies must choose between "dollar capital" and the "Chinese market," leading to a dilemma that will become the norm [38]. - The Ministry of Commerce's swift action demonstrates a commitment to protecting national interests and enforcing compliance with regulations, signaling a shift in how international acquisitions involving Chinese technology will be handled [30][34].