告别美联储看跌期权！Wedbush警告：沃什执掌下流动性红利将终结，未来数月美股或面临动荡

Core Viewpoint - The report from Wedbush indicates that the U.S. stock market may face a period of volatility in the coming months as investors prepare for potential policy reforms under Kevin Warsh's leadership at the Federal Reserve [1]. Group 1: Market Outlook - Wedbush analysts expect market volatility to persist until Warsh officially takes office in May, as investors reassess their positions in light of a significant policy shift away from the framework established during Jerome Powell's tenure [1][2]. - The transition period is anticipated to be bumpy, with Wedbush suggesting that the downside risk in the stock market outweighs the upside risk as investors shift focus to companies with sustainable growth [2]. Group 2: Policy Changes - Under Warsh, the Federal Reserve is expected to shift its focus from interest rates to the size of the central bank's balance sheet, utilizing monetary supply as the primary tool against inflation through quantitative tightening [1][2]. - This change is seen as the end of the "Fed put," which refers to the market's assumption that the central bank would intervene to support asset prices in non-crisis situations [1]. Group 3: Warsh's Background and Views - Warsh, nominated by Trump, has a history of skepticism towards large-scale asset purchases and previously resigned from the Fed in 2011 due to his opposition to the second round of quantitative easing [2][4]. - His nomination signifies a potential ideological shift in U.S. monetary policy, emphasizing inflation control and policy independence, contrasting with Powell's consensus-driven approach [5]. Group 4: Market Implications - Warsh's hawkish stance and support for balance sheet reduction may negatively impact risk assets reliant on excess liquidity while benefiting U.S. Treasuries and the dollar, putting pressure on gold and silver [1][4]. - Analysts believe that while Warsh may implement 2-3 rate cuts this year to align with government expectations, he will also prioritize inflation control, indicating a more stringent approach compared to Powell [5].