冻死事小,失节事大?欧盟硬禁俄气陷绝境,中国绝非“救命稻草”!
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2026-02-02 04:51

Group 1 - The EU's reliance on Russian gas remains significant despite its rhetoric of "de-Russification," with over 76.1% of LNG exports from the Yamal project still reaching EU ports, generating €7.2 billion in revenue for Russia [2] - The extreme winter in early 2026 led to gas storage levels in Germany and the Netherlands dropping below warning thresholds, with Germany at 54.1% and the Netherlands at 46.1%, resulting in widespread energy shortages and increased costs for households [4] - The EU's shift from Russian gas to American LNG has resulted in higher prices, with American LNG expected to account for 70% of EU supplies by 2029, raising concerns about political leverage over Europe [6] Group 2 - The EU's search for alternative energy sources has turned towards China, but China's energy cooperation with Russia is based on mutual benefit and not intended to fill the EU's energy gaps [8] - China's oil imports are projected to decline in 2024 and 2025 due to a strategic shift towards renewable energy and increased domestic production, indicating a reduced reliance on foreign energy [9] - Internal divisions within the EU regarding energy policies are evident, with countries like Hungary and Slovakia opposing bans while others like Poland and Denmark support them, leading to weakened cohesion and exacerbating the energy crisis [9]