多款AI聊天机器人开始引用马斯克旗下Grokipedia作为信息源

Core Insights - Grokipedia, an AI-generated encyclopedia by Elon Musk's xAI, is gaining traction as a source for various AI tools, raising concerns about misinformation and accuracy [1][4][6] Grokipedia Citation Analysis - Since its launch in late October 2022, Grokipedia has been referenced in over 263,000 ChatGPT responses, covering approximately 95,000 unique pages, compared to 2.9 million references to English Wikipedia [1] - Grokipedia accounts for about 0.01% to 0.02% of all ChatGPT citations, showing steady growth since mid-November [2] - In December, Grokipedia's visibility in AI answers increased, but it remains a secondary source compared to established platforms like Wikipedia [2] Comparison of Citation Across Platforms - Grokipedia has more citations in ChatGPT than other platforms, but its presence in Google's AI products like Gemini and AI Overviews has also seen growth [2] - Specific citation counts include approximately 8,600 in Gemini, 567 in AI Overviews, 7,700 in Copilot, and 2 in Perplexity, with notable decreases in Gemini and Perplexity compared to the previous month [2] Usage Context of Grokipedia - AI tools tend to use Grokipedia for niche or specific factual queries, primarily for non-sensitive inquiries [3] - When cited by ChatGPT, Grokipedia is often presented as a primary source, while in AI Overviews, it appears alongside multiple sources as a supplementary reference [3][4] Concerns About Reliability and Accuracy - Experts warn that using Grokipedia as a source poses risks of spreading misinformation and partisan viewpoints due to its lack of human oversight and reliance on unverifiable materials [4][6] - Grokipedia's content has been criticized for containing biased perspectives, including racism and transphobia, and for potentially reinforcing various biases and inaccuracies [4][6] Responses from AI Companies - OpenAI emphasizes that ChatGPT aims to extract information from a wide range of public sources and allows users to evaluate the reliability of cited sources [5] - Perplexity focuses on accuracy as a core advantage but did not comment on the risks associated with AI-generated materials like Grokipedia [5] Summary of Grokipedia - Grokipedia is an AI-generated replica of Wikipedia, lacking human oversight and often containing biased content, making it unreliable as a reference source [7]