86%创作者生计受AI影响，英国作家协会呼吁政府采取行动

Core Insights - The report highlights the urgent need for a new regulatory framework to protect the livelihoods of creators in the creative industries, as 86% of authors report income reductions due to generative AI [1][2] - A significant portion of creators, including 72% of respondents, indicate a decrease in job opportunities, with 57% struggling to sustain their careers [1][2] Group 1: Impact of Generative AI - 86% of authors have experienced income reductions attributed to generative AI, with 43% of literary translators reporting significant impacts [1] - 72% of surveyed creators noted a reduction in job opportunities, while 57% expressed difficulties in sustaining their careers [1] - 43% of literary translators and 37% of illustrators reported sharp declines in income due to generative AI, with 26% of illustrators and 36% of literary translators stating that previously commissioned projects were canceled or altered [1] Group 2: Call for Regulatory Action - The UK Writers' Association calls for the government to implement a clear regulatory framework for AI, which includes prohibiting the use of works for training generative AI without explicit consent [2] - Proposed measures include establishing a statutory licensing scheme for AI developers to legally access works, ensuring authors receive payment and attribution [2] - The report emphasizes the need for enforceable ethical standards in data management and accountability regarding the use of copyrighted works [2] Group 3: Underlying Issues in the Publishing Industry - The report identifies a deeper issue within the publishing industry, where control has shifted to executives focused on finance, copyright, and sales, leading to a commodification of creativity [3] - Generative AI is seen as automating a pre-existing logic in the industry, where works are treated as interchangeable content, and authors are viewed as disposable suppliers [3] - The analysis suggests that the publishing industry must prioritize attribution, origin, and creative honor as structural necessities rather than mere sentiments to effectively address the challenges posed by generative AI [3]