关于地缘经济的几点宏观思考

Core Insights - Geoeconomics has evolved from an academic concept to a significant topic in global economics and policy, shifting from cooperation in globalization to competition driven by economic means [2] - The analysis by CICC Research Institute and CICC Research Department explores the implications of geoeconomic competition on macroeconomic policies and frameworks [2] Group 1: Historical Context and Policy Shifts - Since the late 1970s, economic liberalism, centered around neoclassical economics, has dominated, leading to globalization and financialization [3] - The macroeconomic policy framework has focused on controlling inflation, with a combination of inflation targeting, floating exchange rates, and trade and financial liberalization [4] - The rise of financial crises and increasing wealth disparity have prompted reflections on neoclassical economics, leading to a shift towards protectionism and increased financial regulation post-2008 financial crisis [5] Group 2: Geoeconomic Competition and Macroeconomic Policy - Geoeconomic competition emphasizes the importance of economies of scale in international trade and global supply chains, challenging traditional trade theories [6] - Technological advancements have become a core area of competition among nations, necessitating increased government involvement in research and development [7] - The non-neutrality of money may manifest in new forms, affecting economic structures and necessitating responses to supply chain risks and trade protection measures [8] Group 3: Supply Constraints and Global Trade Dynamics - The increase in supply constraints has implications for long-term economic growth, with economies of scale being a key driver of global trade expansion [9] - Geoeconomic competition has led to the use of trade protectionism and technology export restrictions, impacting the efficiency of economies of scale [10] - The competition between the U.S. and China highlights the significance of economic scale, with China as a trade surplus nation and the U.S. focusing on enhancing its manufacturing capacity [11] Group 4: Technological and Economic Shifts - The transition to green energy and the rise of the digital economy are significant trends that promote economies of scale, contrasting with the constraints imposed by geoeconomic competition [12] - The dynamics of technological advancement and innovation are critical in understanding the evolving landscape of geoeconomic competition [13] Group 5: Geoeconomic and Technological Interplay - The emergence of "geoeconomic technology" reflects the growing importance of technology in geoeconomic competition, with nations vying for dominance in strategic technologies [14] - The U.S. and China are engaged in intense competition over high-tech resources, impacting global supply chains and economic structures [15] Group 6: Fiscal Policy and Financialization - The trend of de-financialization is evident in the increasing number of financial sanctions and the rising role of fiscal policy in the global economy [18] - U.S. fiscal deficits have risen significantly, impacting monetary supply and economic demand, with implications for inflation and trade balances [19][20] - The increase in defense spending among nations reflects a shift in fiscal priorities, influencing demand without directly enhancing supply capabilities [21] Group 7: Economic Scale and Global Competition - The competition between large economies emphasizes the importance of absolute economic scale, with smaller economies facing challenges in achieving economies of scale [23] - The future of geoeconomic competition will be primarily centered around the U.S. and China, with implications for manufacturing, digital economy, and monetary finance [24] - China's manufacturing sector benefits from economies of scale, while the U.S. leverages its consumer market to influence global trade dynamics [25] Group 8: Conclusion and Future Outlook - The interplay between supply capabilities and demand dynamics is crucial for understanding the ongoing geoeconomic competition, with both nations needing to address structural weaknesses [27] - Fiscal expansion is necessary for maintaining economic stability and supporting the transition to new growth drivers in the face of geoeconomic challenges [28]