美伊核谈破冰！伊朗外长称双方就继续谈判达成共识

Core Viewpoint - The indirect talks between the U.S. and Iran in Oman mark a significant step towards addressing the long-standing nuclear dispute, with both sides expressing a willingness to continue discussions despite existing tensions [1][3]. Group 1: Negotiation Progress - The talks were described as a "good start" by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, who indicated that both parties agreed to continue negotiations [1]. - Oman’s Foreign Ministry emphasized the importance of these discussions for achieving lasting security and stability in the region [1]. - Araqchi mentioned that the next steps would be coordinated by both governments, highlighting a potential framework agreement if progress continues [1]. Group 2: Challenges and Concerns - Mutual distrust is identified as a significant challenge in the negotiations, which must be addressed for any progress to be made [3]. - The U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed a desire to expand the negotiation topics to include Iran's ballistic missile program and support for regional armed groups, which Iran has firmly rejected [2][4]. - Iranian officials have reiterated their stance against discussing missile programs, viewing it as a red line, while also expressing concerns over U.S. military presence in the region [2][4]. Group 3: Regional Implications - The potential failure of these talks raises fears of renewed conflict in the Middle East, which could have broader implications for the oil-rich region [3]. - Iran has warned that any military action against it would be met with a strong response, including targeting Gulf Arab neighbors hosting U.S. bases [4]. - The ongoing tensions are compounded by the U.S. military buildup in the region, which has heightened fears of escalation [3][4].