刚对中国承诺没两天，被美国接管的委内瑞拉，开始将俄企扫地出门

Core Viewpoint - The recent termination of the Venezuela-Russia oil cooperation agreement, which was expected to last until 2041, raises questions about Venezuela's policy stability and potential U.S. influence behind the scenes [1][4][24]. Group 1: Agreement Termination - Venezuela unilaterally terminated the oil cooperation agreement with Russia, which was signed just two months prior [3][7]. - The agreement was seen as a foundation for long-term collaboration, involving significant Russian investments estimated between $17 billion to $19 billion since 2006 [11][20]. Group 2: U.S. Influence and Control - The abrupt termination of the agreement has led to speculation about U.S. involvement, with suggestions that the U.S. aims to exert absolute control over Venezuela's energy resources [4][16]. - The U.S. has implemented a system to manage oil sales, where a significant portion of revenue is redirected away from the Venezuelan government, effectively limiting its financial autonomy [18][20]. Group 3: Implications for International Relations - The situation indicates a shift in Venezuela's sovereignty, with the new regime appearing to act as a proxy for U.S. interests, undermining previous international agreements [14][22]. - China's response to the situation, including a halt in oil purchases from Venezuela, signals a lack of trust in the new government and highlights the precariousness of foreign investments in the country [24][26]. Group 4: Broader Consequences - The developments in Venezuela reflect a broader trend of U.S. dominance in Latin America, where countries that resist U.S. influence may face similar fates [30][32]. - The situation serves as a cautionary tale about the fragility of international agreements in the face of shifting power dynamics and the potential for exploitation under the guise of aid and cooperation [32].