别在直播间找“救星”

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the rise of illegal "proxy rights protection" schemes that exploit financial consumers through misleading advertisements and false promises, prompting regulatory bodies to issue warnings against such practices [1][3][10]. Group 1: Regulatory Response - On February 6, multiple regulatory bodies including the Financial Regulatory Bureau and the People's Bank of China issued a risk warning against illegal "proxy rights protection" schemes, emphasizing their disruptive impact on the financial market and consumer rights [1][3]. - Financial institutions are actively publishing warnings about illegal "proxy rights protection" to guide consumers towards legitimate channels for rights protection [10][11]. Group 2: Characteristics of Illegal Practices - The core issues of illegal "proxy rights protection" are concentrated on social media platforms, where false information and disguised professional identities are used to lure consumers into paying high consultation fees [3][6]. - Common tactics include fabricating regulatory updates and misleading claims about debt recovery and credit repair, which confuse consumers and lead them to believe in non-existent policies [3][4]. Group 3: Consumer Vulnerability - The emergence of illegal "proxy rights protection" is rooted in the information asymmetry and anxiety of financial consumers, who often seek quick solutions to disputes with financial institutions [6][12]. - Many consumers are misled by promises of "full refund" or "debt clearance," which creates opportunities for fraudsters to exploit their desperation [6][12]. Group 4: Online Evolution of Fraud - The shift from offline to online platforms has allowed illegal "proxy rights protection" schemes to scale up and diversify, utilizing short videos and live streams for broader reach and lower costs [6][10]. - These platforms enable real-time interaction and targeted persuasion, significantly enhancing the effectiveness of fraudulent marketing [6][10]. Group 5: Consumer Education and Protection - Financial consumers are urged to recognize legitimate rights protection channels and remain vigilant against illegal "proxy rights protection" traps to maintain a clear financial environment [1][10]. - Regulatory bodies stress the importance of verifying information through official channels and discourage reliance on social media "experts" or intermediaries [9][12].