欧媒：都怪中国不肯帮忙，欧洲去中国化又失败了，中方要负责

Core Viewpoint - The bankruptcy of Northvolt Battery serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of pursuing "decoupling" from China while neglecting the importance of technical expertise and operational knowledge [1][7][21] Group 1: Company Background and Performance - Northvolt Battery was established nine years ago with high expectations, but it burned through 100 billion in funding and achieved less than 1% of its initial production capacity [3] - The company declared bankruptcy in March of the previous year, leaving behind advanced lithium battery production equipment that remains unused [3][21] - Despite efforts to build production capacity in 2023, the company faced operational challenges due to a lack of trained personnel who could operate the sophisticated equipment [5][10] Group 2: Operational Challenges - The operational issues stemmed from a refusal to accept Chinese technical expertise, leading to a disconnect between advanced equipment and the knowledge required to operate it [7][10] - Workers relied on translation software to understand equipment instructions, highlighting a significant gap in training and technical support [5][10] Group 3: Management Decisions and Political Context - Northvolt's management aimed to create a European battery supply chain independent of China, driven by political considerations and a sense of superiority [7][10] - The company implemented strict regulations that barred Chinese engineers from assisting, which exacerbated its operational difficulties [10][19] Group 4: Aftermath and Public Perception - Following bankruptcy, Northvolt's management sought to blame external factors rather than reflect on their own failures, leading to a narrative that framed the situation as a geopolitical issue rather than a business failure [12][14] - The Swedish government and media began to shift blame onto Chinese equipment, suggesting that operational failures were part of a larger conspiracy [15][19] Group 5: Lessons Learned - The downfall of Northvolt is not just a failure of a single company but reflects a broader failure in understanding the complexities of manufacturing and the importance of accumulated knowledge and experience [21][24] - The attempt to replicate a successful model without the necessary expertise and experience ultimately led to the company's demise, illustrating that manufacturing requires consistent effort and learning rather than shortcuts [24]