加快推进数据要素市场化（锐财经）

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government has issued an opinion to cultivate three types of data circulation service institutions to accelerate the marketization and value realization of data elements, aiming to enhance the data market ecosystem [4][10]. Group 1: Types of Data Circulation Service Institutions - The three types of data circulation service institutions defined are: data exchanges (centers), data circulation service platform enterprises, and data merchants, each with specific roles to play in promoting data circulation and marketization [5][6]. - Data exchanges are encouraged to enhance comprehensive service functions, including rule exploration, compliance assurance, and service matching [5]. - Data circulation service platform enterprises are supported to develop specialized services around industry and supply chains [5]. - Data merchants are urged to expand data acquisition channels and develop diverse data products and services [5]. Group 2: Enhancing Data Market Ecology - The opinion emphasizes the need for a clear functional positioning and collaborative development among various data circulation service institutions to establish a structured framework for the data circulation service system [6][10]. - It aims to stimulate the data market by encouraging diverse data circulation transaction models and enhancing service capabilities [8][10]. - The opinion supports the exploration of innovative data circulation transaction modes, such as data exchange for services or models, to lower transaction costs and promote broader data circulation [8]. Group 3: Addressing Data Scarcity in AI - The opinion addresses the "data scarcity" issue faced by many AI companies by supporting collaboration between data circulation service institutions and industry leaders to build high-quality data sets [9]. - It encourages partnerships with AI enterprises to provide data aggregation, governance, and model training services [9]. Group 4: Future Goals and Implementation - By the end of 2029, the goal is to significantly enhance the capabilities of data circulation service institutions, diversify transaction forms, and enrich data products and services [10]. - The opinion proposes promoting the use of standardized data circulation transaction contracts to ensure compliance and efficiency in data transactions [10]. - Industry experts view this opinion as a systematic and forward-looking design to address the critical "circulation bottleneck" in the value realization of data elements, marking a transition to a more functional and vibrant data market [10][11].