“薄利”的微医:第三次冲击港交所,被AI巨头“抢生意”
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2026-02-09 05:08

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that WeDoctor's AI foundation appears unstable, as it relies on third-party foundational models and has seen a decline in R&D expenses, raising concerns about its future in the competitive AI healthcare market [2][21][30] - WeDoctor's IPO attempts have faced challenges, with the recent withdrawal of its coordinator, CMB International, raising questions about its future prospects despite a booming IPO market in Hong Kong [2][4] - The company has reported significant losses, with a cumulative loss of nearly 1.8 billion RMB from 2022 to the first half of 2025, and has not yet achieved profitability [4][6][15] Group 2 - WeDoctor's revenue has shown explosive growth, reaching 30.8 billion RMB in the first half of 2025, a year-on-year increase of 69.43%, but it remains deeply unprofitable [6][8] - The company's business model, which relies on earning from healthcare fund surpluses, is described as a "hard business" with low margins and challenges in scalability [8][11][15] - The health management services segment has seen a nearly tenfold increase in revenue, but its profit margins are extremely low, with a profit margin of only 0.7% in the first half of 2025 [9][10] Group 3 - Major competitors like Ant Group, Baidu, and iFlytek are entering the G-end market, intensifying competition for WeDoctor, which is struggling to establish itself [5][25][29] - WeDoctor's reliance on third-party AI models and reduced R&D spending has raised concerns about its ability to innovate and compete effectively in the AI healthcare space [21][30] - The company has expanded its operations to cities like Shanghai and Hangzhou, but remains heavily dependent on its primary market in Tianjin, which accounted for 77.6% of its revenue in the first half of 2025 [14][15]