字节顶不住了？

Core Insights - ByteDance's new video model Seedance 2.0 has unexpectedly removed the ability to reference real human materials, likely to avoid escalating issues [2] - The model's unique capability allows it to "imagine" content logic beyond prompts, which raises concerns about the implications of AI-generated content [2][3] - The internal testing phase is prioritized over public demonstrations to identify issues, indicating a cautious approach to AI development [3] Group 1 - The public figure Tim's experience with Seedance 2.0 highlights the model's ability to closely replicate his voice, raising ethical concerns about data usage [2][3] - The ongoing development of AI models like Seedance 2.0 reflects a broader existential crisis as human imagery is increasingly utilized by machines, leading to a decrease in production costs [3] - ByteDance's retraction of certain features serves as a warning about the potential misuse of powerful AI technologies [3] Group 2 - The model has gained significant attention on social media, trending on platforms like Twitter, despite being in limited internal testing in China [6] - There is a growing demand for access to Seedance 2.0 from international creators, indicating its potential impact on the global market [6] - The technology's rapid advancement raises questions about copyright agreements, as seen with the licensing deal with Disney, which may not be sustainable long-term [3]