国会再度质询“爱泼斯坦”，美国商务部长“改口”承认：2012年曾上岛

Core Viewpoint - The testimony of U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick regarding his past interactions with Jeffrey Epstein has raised questions about his credibility and suitability for his position, particularly after admitting to a visit to Epstein's private island in 2012, contradicting his previous claims of distancing himself from Epstein after 2005 [1][5]. Group 1: Testimony and Admission - Lutnick acknowledged that he and his family visited Epstein's island during a vacation in 2012, where they had lunch for about an hour [2][3]. - He emphasized that he had no fear in reviewing documents related to Epstein, asserting that he and his wife had not engaged in any wrongdoing [3]. Group 2: Congressional Inquiry and Political Pressure - The Senate hearing focused on whether Lutnick misled Congress and the public about the extent of his relationship with Epstein, impacting his credibility [5][6]. - Calls for Lutnick's resignation have emerged from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers, indicating a growing political pressure on him [6][7]. Group 3: Broader Implications and Political Landscape - The controversy surrounding Lutnick has prompted a wider examination of connections between Epstein and various political and business figures, including President Trump and former President Clinton [8]. - The duality of White House support for Lutnick and the increasing calls for his resignation suggests ongoing political instability and potential risks for the administration [8].