为什么越来越多的软件被“用完即弃”？

Core Insights - The article discusses a significant shift in the software industry, where software is transitioning from being viewed as a long-term asset to a disposable product, driven by changes in production costs, organizational structures, and business models [1][4][22]. Group 1: Changing Nature of Software - Software is increasingly being developed for short-term use, often created for specific tasks and discarded after completion, rather than being maintained as long-term systems [1][3][4]. - Examples of this trend include applications developed for single events or temporary needs, such as a birthday party app or a family news app, which are deleted after use [2]. Group 2: Structural Changes in Software Production - Four structural changes are occurring simultaneously in the software industry: 1. Software is shifting from system-based to task-based forms, focusing on completing specific tasks rather than long-term operation [5][6]. 2. Business departments are taking the lead in system development, utilizing low-code and no-code platforms to create temporary solutions [7]. 3. AI development tools are making it more cost-effective to rewrite software rather than maintain it, leading to frequent replacements of internal systems [8]. 4. Result-based payment models are emerging, allowing businesses to pay for software based on quantifiable outcomes rather than long-term usage [9]. Group 3: Impacts on the Software Industry - The traditional criteria for evaluating software quality are becoming obsolete, with a shift towards valuing speed of delivery and quantifiable results over long-term maintainability [11][12]. - The focus of development is moving from building long-lasting systems to creating reusable components and workflows that can be quickly adapted for various tasks [14]. - Pricing models are evolving from annual subscriptions to more flexible structures based on results or task completion, reflecting the transient nature of many software applications [15]. - Customer relationships are shifting from long-term partnerships to project-based collaborations, requiring vendors to continuously demonstrate efficiency and results to secure future contracts [16]. Group 4: Boundaries of Software Consumption - Not all software should adopt a disposable model; critical systems related to core business functions, security, and compliance must maintain long-term viability due to their high stakes [17][18]. - The article warns against blindly applying the disposable model in inappropriate contexts, as it may lead to technical debt and a lack of understanding of key processes [20]. Conclusion - The trend of software consumerization is a natural outcome of increased production efficiency in the AI era, leading to a proliferation of software with shorter lifecycles [22][24]. - Companies must develop the ability to distinguish between different software types, determining which should be disposable and which require long-term investment [21][25].