184万亿资管版图重塑 私募洗牌、公募扩张、基金子公司加速出清
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2026-02-11 08:53

Core Insights - The total scale of China's asset management industry is projected to reach 184.53 trillion yuan by 2025, marking a historical high, but the industry is undergoing significant structural adjustments and consolidation [2][5] - The overall growth rate of the industry is 13.1%, with notable performance divergence across different segments [2] Public Funds and Trusts - The public fund sector shows strong growth, with a year-on-year increase of 14.89%, reaching 37.71 trillion yuan, alongside an optimization of product structure [2][3] - The trust industry also performs well, with a 20.11% growth to 32.43 trillion yuan, driven by a fundamental shift in business structure towards asset management trusts and service trusts [3] Private Securities Investment Funds - The private securities investment fund sector is experiencing a structural adjustment, with the number of managers decreasing by 469 to 7,531, and the number of products dropping by 7,443, yet the management scale increased by 35.81% to 7.08 trillion yuan [3] - This indicates a concentration of resources towards leading institutions, while underperforming smaller firms are exiting the market, reflecting a "reduction in quantity and increase in quality" trend [3] Regulatory Environment and Market Innovation - Regulatory policies are guiding industry changes, with new policies introduced in Q4 2025 focusing on areas like pension finance expansion and asset management trust standardization [4] - Market innovations are emerging, including new products and business models, such as the first ship ETF and various financial asset investment companies focusing on equity investments [4] Future Outlook - The industry scale of 184 trillion yuan marks the beginning of a new phase of structural differentiation, where institutions that adapt to regulations and enhance active management capabilities will gain market share [5] - The ability to develop a professional capability system that aligns with the needs of the real economy will ultimately determine each institution's position in the reshaped industry landscape [5]