Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal implications of marriage brokerage services in China, particularly regarding the introduction of foreign partners and the potential for contract invalidation due to regulatory violations [1] Group 1: Legal Framework - Domestic marriage introduction agencies are prohibited from engaging in or indirectly conducting foreign marriage introduction services, making the contract between the agency and the client invalid [1] - According to the Civil Code, if a contract is deemed invalid, any property obtained through that contract must be returned, which means the agency should refund the 60,000 yuan fee as it constitutes unjust enrichment [1] Group 2: Potential Legal Actions - The sudden disappearance of the foreign spouse after one year may indicate marriage fraud, allowing the client to report the matter to law enforcement to pursue legal action against the foreign individual [1]
花6万为智力残障儿子娶外籍妻子，1年后对方失踪，律师解读
Guan Cha Zhe Wang·2026-02-12 14:22