加拿大没成第51州，川普被抄后路，美众院禁止加税，霸权时代告终

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shifting dynamics of U.S.-Canada relations, highlighting Canada's strategic pivot towards China in the electric vehicle sector as a response to U.S. threats and tariffs under Trump's administration [1][9]. Group 1: Canada's Electric Vehicle Strategy - Canada has officially launched a national electric vehicle strategy, collaborating with China to establish joint manufacturing and allowing nearly 50,000 Chinese electric vehicles to enter the market annually at low tariffs [3]. - The Canadian government aims to produce electric vehicles for global markets, indicating a shift from being a mere supplier to the U.S. to becoming an independent player in the global supply chain [20][22]. Group 2: U.S. Response and Internal Conflict - Trump's aggressive stance included threats of 100% tariffs on Canadian goods and demands for shared ownership of a $4.7 billion bridge, which Canada rejected [5][30]. - The U.S. Congress showed internal division, with a narrow majority opposing Trump's proposed tariffs on Canada, indicating a growing dissent within the Republican Party [7][49]. Group 3: Economic and Political Implications - Canada's decision to seek partnerships with China is seen as a rational choice to mitigate risks associated with over-reliance on the U.S. market, especially given the volatility of U.S. trade policies [10][14]. - Public support in Canada for increased collaboration with China is significant, with over 60% of Canadians favoring the introduction of more Chinese electric vehicles, reflecting a pragmatic approach to economic security [24]. Group 4: Broader Strategic Moves - Canada is not acting in isolation; it is also pursuing battery cooperation with South Korea and trade negotiations with India, indicating a strategy to diversify its economic partnerships [26]. - This "multi-point flowering" strategy aims to create a decentralized economic safety net, reducing vulnerability to U.S. market fluctuations [28]. Group 5: Future Outlook - The article suggests that Canada's actions are part of a larger trend of middle powers asserting their autonomy in the global order, moving away from blind allegiance to major powers [70][72]. - The evolving landscape indicates that alliances based on coercion are becoming less effective, as countries like Canada seek to establish their own strategic choices and partnerships [74].