SpaceX向上市冲刺：拟IPO用双重股权结构，与xAI合并后考虑重组债务

Core Insights - SpaceX is preparing for an IPO later this year, aiming to raise up to $50 billion while implementing a dual-class share structure to maintain Elon Musk's control and address significant debt from the merger with xAI [1][2] Group 1: Dual-Class Share Structure - The dual-class share structure will grant specific shareholders, including Musk, enhanced voting rights, allowing him to retain control despite holding a minority stake [1][2] - This strategy mirrors Musk's previous proposals for Tesla, where he sought to ensure at least 25% voting control [2] - Dual-class structures are common in U.S. tech companies, providing founders with greater decision-making power while critics argue it reduces accountability [2] Group 2: Debt Restructuring - SpaceX faces the urgent task of managing approximately $18 billion in debt accumulated from Musk's acquisition of Twitter and the establishment of xAI [3][4] - Morgan Stanley is expected to play a leading role in the financing plan to alleviate the debt burden before the IPO [3] - The debt from the Twitter acquisition continues to impact xAI, with significant monthly interest payments [3][4] Group 3: Financial Performance and Risks - SpaceX is projected to generate $15 to $16 billion in revenue by 2025, with an EBITDA of around $8 billion and a profit margin of approximately 50% [5] - In contrast, xAI is struggling financially, with only about $210 million in revenue for the first nine months of 2025 and a cash burn rate of $8 to $9.5 billion [5] - SpaceX has committed to investing $2 billion into xAI, but competition for resources in the AI sector remains intense [5][6] Group 4: IPO Timeline and Market Context - SpaceX aims for a record-setting IPO around mid-June 2026, coinciding with significant astronomical events and Musk's birthday [7][8] - The company is expected to be valued at over $1.5 trillion during the IPO, surpassing the previous record set by Saudi Aramco [7] - The timeline for the IPO is considered tight, with necessary regulatory filings and market conditions posing challenges [7][8]