Exxon Mobil can sue California attorney general for defamation over recycling, judge rules

Core Viewpoint - A federal judge ruled that Exxon Mobil can proceed with its defamation lawsuit against California Attorney General Rob Bonta, rejecting Bonta's claim of immunity related to his criticisms of Exxon's recycling initiatives [1]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The judge, Michael Truncale, dismissed Bonta's immunity claim, stating that whether Bonta's criticisms were made in good faith is a factual question to be determined later [1]. - Related claims against environmental groups were dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction [1]. - Exxon filed the lawsuit against Bonta in January 2025, following California's lawsuit accusing Exxon of misleading the public about recycling [1]. Group 2: Statements and Allegations - Exxon objected to 14 statements made by Bonta, including claims that Exxon's recycling plan was "not based on truth" and that only 5% of U.S. plastic waste is recycled [1]. - The judge indicated that it would not be unfair to review certain statements for possible defamation, as they were directly related to Exxon and based on Texas sources [1]. - Bonta's statements included claims about plastic waste accumulation in Houston and the environmental impact of unrecycled plastics [1]. Group 3: Context and Implications - Exxon has shown a willingness to confront environmental critics who argue that its operations contribute to climate change and greenhouse gas emissions [1]. - The case highlights the ongoing tension between major oil companies and environmental advocates regarding sustainability and corporate responsibility [1].