同为世界行业老大又同时上市，涨幅天壤之别，背后藏着什么秘密？

Group 1 - The article highlights a contrasting performance between two companies:沃尔核材, which experienced a modest increase of 2.94% on its first trading day, and海致科技, which saw a dramatic surge of 242% despite continuous losses [1][2][3]. - 沃尔核材 holds a significant market share of 20.6% globally and 58.5% domestically, with a net profit of 822 million in the first three quarters [1][2]. - 海致科技's IPO was marked by an excessive subscription rate of 5065 times and a low winning rate of 0.06%, indicating a misjudgment in pricing by the company and underwriters [4][5]. Group 2 - The modest increase of 沃尔核材 reflects a well-calibrated pricing strategy, with an issue price of 12.2 HKD that aligns with market expectations, allowing the company to secure necessary funds [6][7]. - In contrast, 海致科技's pricing misstep resulted in a significant loss of potential capital, as the difference between the issue price of 27 HKD and the closing price of 92 HKD should have benefited the company [4][8]. - The article emphasizes that the true winners in the market are those who understand their value and price accordingly, as demonstrated by 沃尔核材's successful IPO strategy [8][10]. Group 3 - The market's reaction to 海致科技's story-driven appeal, despite its financial instability, illustrates a broader trend where speculative investments overshadow fundamental value [9][10]. - The article discusses the dichotomy in investor behavior, where rational assessments of companies do not always translate into buying decisions, leading to a preference for high-risk, high-reward stocks like 海致科技 [15][16]. - Ultimately, the article concludes that the real lesson from this IPO event is that a company like 沃尔核材, which focuses on stable growth and accurate pricing, is more likely to succeed in the long run compared to a company like 海致科技, which relies on market hype [17].