奇耻大辱啊，欧洲不敢挪用俄资产援乌，却叫乌克兰战斗至最后一人

Group 1 - The Munich Security Conference has been a significant setback for Ukraine, as a proposal to use frozen Russian assets for aid was rejected, despite Ukraine recently receiving a $35 billion commitment from NATO defense ministers [1] - European countries failed to reach a consensus on the proposal to utilize frozen Russian assets, highlighting the financial strain Europe is under and the lack of alternative solutions for supporting Ukraine [3] - The urgency for Ukraine to secure funding is critical, yet the inability of Europe to agree on the use of frozen assets reflects deep concerns about potential Russian retaliation and financial risks [3] Group 2 - UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer emphasized that a swift end to the Ukraine war would be detrimental to Europe, as it would allow Russia to rearm and restore its military capabilities, indicating a preference for Ukraine to continue fighting [5] - The UK's stance reveals a geopolitical anxiety, as it relies on Ukraine to absorb the military threat from Russia, thereby avoiding direct confrontation [7] - The lack of adequate support for Ukraine while expecting it to continue fighting is seen as a denial of its basic rights and a disrespect to its efforts, likening it to wanting a horse to run without providing it with food [8]