得知高院否决关税那一刻，特朗普“气炸了”，“破口大骂”

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration's large-scale tariff measures under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) lacked clear legal authorization, leading to significant political and economic implications for the Trump administration [1]. Group 1: Trump's Reaction - Following the Supreme Court's ruling, Trump expressed anger and frustration, labeling the decision a "disgrace" and criticizing the conservative justices who voted against him, including two he appointed [2][4]. - Trump publicly attacked the plaintiffs of the lawsuit, a family-run educational toy manufacturer, calling them "sleaze bags" and suggesting that the justices were influenced by foreign powers and Democrats [2][4]. Group 2: Legal and Institutional Implications - Analysts noted that Trump's reaction shifted the focus from tariffs to his blatant disregard for institutional norms, raising concerns about the impact on U.S. political and economic foundations [4]. - Legal experts expressed alarm over Trump's unprecedented attacks on the Supreme Court, indicating that his approach could undermine the independence of the judiciary and create significant market uncertainties [4]. Group 3: Future Tariff Plans - Despite the legal setback, Trump announced plans to impose an additional 10% tariff on global goods, indicating that tariffs would continue in a different form [5]. - This new tariff policy is expected to take effect within approximately three days and is based on a different legal authority than the one previously rejected by the court [5].