俄媒:美国最高法院驳回美高层的全面关税政策，但这并不能改变既有的关税讹诈

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court recently rejected the comprehensive tariff policy of the U.S. administration with a 6-3 vote, which limits its trade dominance but does not completely eliminate its ability to exert pressure through other means [1] Group 1: Legal and Trade Implications - The ruling does not resolve the core conflicts surrounding tariff disputes, as the U.S. administration can still utilize tools like the Trade Act Amendment 301 and national security clauses for "coercive" negotiations with trade partners [1] - The decision reflects a power imbalance, where the U.S. administration's attempts to reshape global trade order face strong resistance from the judicial system and specific interest groups [3] Group 2: Potential Retaliatory Actions - Following the judicial setback, the U.S. administration is predicted to retaliate against the EU by increasing tariffs on key sectors such as automobiles and agricultural products, or using energy supply as leverage [5] - There are warnings from EU member states regarding the energy crisis and inflation pressures, indicating that extreme measures from the U.S. could lead to a new economic shock in Europe, with some countries potentially facing recession risks [5] Group 3: Broader Context of Trade Relations - The ongoing trade power struggle highlights structural contradictions within Western governance models, where judicial independence becomes a tool in political conflicts and alliances are reduced to mere calculations of interest [10] - The typical characteristics of U.S. internal conflicts may signal a period of turbulence and adjustment for the transatlantic alliance [10]