急转弯的美国关税,欧美汽车业乐观与忧虑并存
Guan Cha Zhe Wang·2026-02-21 09:21

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Trump does not have the authority to impose broad tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), potentially allowing thousands of businesses to seek refunds for tariffs paid, amounting to over $175 billion (approximately 1.26 trillion yuan) [1][10]. Group 1: Supreme Court Ruling Implications - The ruling may limit Trump's presidential power but does not clarify the refund process for the tariffs collected [1][10]. - The Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated that the refund process could be complicated and burdensome for businesses, potentially leading to lengthy litigation [1][10]. - Companies seeking refunds will need to meticulously review their import records, which could impose significant administrative burdens [1][10]. Group 2: New Tariff Announcement - Shortly after the ruling, Trump announced a new 10% tariff on global goods for 150 days under the Trade Act of 1974, effective February 24 [3][12]. - Certain products, including passenger cars and some truck parts, are exempt from this new tariff, which is seen as a temporary victory for automotive manufacturers and suppliers [3][12]. - The U.S. Automotive Policy Council had previously urged the White House to maintain exemptions for automotive products to avoid multiple layers of tariffs [3][12]. Group 3: Industry Reactions and Economic Impact - The automotive industry has already paid approximately $8.6 billion (around 61.9 billion yuan) in tariffs, which are now deemed legally questionable [5][15]. - The European Union expressed a mix of optimism and concern, emphasizing the need for stable and predictable trade relations [5][15]. - Experts warn that tariffs could re-emerge in revised forms, creating operational and legal uncertainties for businesses [8][17]. - The U.S. trade deficit grew by 2.1% last year, reaching $1.23 trillion (approximately 8.86 trillion yuan), indicating that tariffs have not significantly improved trade balance as claimed by Trump [5][15].