美国高院刚宣判，特朗普大怒，美媒发现不对劲：中方根本不在意

Group 1 - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were illegal, requiring congressional authorization for such actions [2][3][5] - The ruling means that hundreds of billions of dollars collected in tariffs over the past year are now considered "illegal gains," leading to potential lawsuits for refunds from U.S. companies [5][6] - The authority of the president to impose tariffs has been significantly weakened, creating uncertainty for U.S. trade policy moving forward [6][21] Group 2 - China's calm reaction to the ruling reflects its prior understanding that the legal basis for Trump's tariff strategy was weak, indicating a long-term strategic outlook rather than a short-term victory [11][19] - Chinese companies are focusing on building a resilient domestic economy, with significant investments in technology and consumer markets, which can withstand external pressures [18][22] - The visit of German Chancellor Merz to China, accompanied by business leaders, highlights the importance of stable supply chains and the attractiveness of the Chinese market for global companies [11][13] Group 3 - The ruling is expected to create more procedural hurdles for future tariff implementations, making it less likely that the U.S. will pursue aggressive tariff policies as it did in the past [21][22] - The focus for China is on enhancing its economic self-sufficiency and technological capabilities, which are seen as critical for navigating future trade challenges [19][23]