特朗普全球关税被最高法院否决后遭嘲讽，纽森：可怜的小猪

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against President Trump's tariff policy, leading to his aggressive response and subsequent increase in tariffs on global goods, which has drawn criticism and mockery from political opponents [1][5][7]. Group 1: Supreme Court Ruling - The Supreme Court deemed Trump's broad reciprocal tariff policy unconstitutional, stating he exceeded his authority without Congressional approval [7][8]. - Trump's reaction included labeling the justices as "unpatriotic" and expressing shame over the ruling, claiming it was influenced by foreign interests [7][8]. Group 2: Tariff Policy Changes - Following the ruling, Trump signed an executive order to impose a 10% tariff on all imports, later increasing it to 15%, the maximum allowed under the relevant law [5][8]. - The law cited by Trump, Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, is intended for short-term emergencies rather than long-term economic policy [8][11]. Group 3: Political Reactions - French President Emmanuel Macron welcomed the Supreme Court's decision, emphasizing the importance of checks and balances in a democracy [1]. - California Governor Gavin Newsom mocked Trump, suggesting he was losing control and calling for the return of funds taken from American citizens due to the illegal tariffs [5][7]. - Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker sent a bill for $8.6 billion in tariff refunds to Trump, threatening further action if not addressed [5]. Group 4: Legal Framework for Tariffs - Trump has other legal avenues to pursue tariffs, including Section 301 for discriminatory foreign trade practices and Section 232 for national security threats, which he previously used for steel and aluminum [11]. - The 1930 Tariff Act also provides grounds for imposing tariffs on countries that discriminate against U.S. businesses [11].