全球媒体聚焦 | 外媒：美国最高法院关税裁决留下1300亿美元“退款难题”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that deemed the White House's tariff policy illegal, particularly focusing on the unresolved issue of refunding approximately $130 billion in tariffs collected under this policy [1][2]. Group 1: Legal and Financial Implications - The Supreme Court's ruling did not provide clear guidance on the refund process for the $130 billion in tariffs, leading to expectations of a prolonged legal battle over refunds [1][2]. - U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen indicated that any potential refunds could be delayed for years due to the lack of direction from the Supreme Court regarding the refund issue [2]. Group 2: Impact on Businesses - Experts suggest that refunds are likely to benefit large corporations, as small businesses may lack the resources to navigate the complex refund application process [2]. - Over 1,000 companies had already applied for tariff refunds prior to the Supreme Court's decision, and this number is expected to grow [2]. Group 3: Refund Process Complexity - The refund process requires detailed application materials, and each importing company must initiate its own lawsuit to have a chance at receiving a refund, making the legal process complicated and lengthy [5]. - Historical precedents exist where the government refunded tariffs following Supreme Court rulings, but such processes are often time-consuming and do not benefit consumers who indirectly paid the tariffs [5].