商务部就美国最高法院公布关税诉讼案裁决结果答记者问

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. government's imposition of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act is illegal, which has significant implications for U.S.-China trade relations [1]. Group 1: U.S. Supreme Court Ruling - The ruling declared that the tariffs imposed on trade partners, including the fentanyl tariffs, are unlawful [1]. - The Chinese government is conducting a comprehensive assessment of the ruling's content and impact [1]. Group 2: Chinese Government's Response - The Chinese government opposes unilateral tariff measures and emphasizes that trade wars yield no winners and protectionism is not a viable solution [1]. - It is highlighted that unilateral measures by the U.S. violate international trade rules and U.S. domestic law, which do not align with the interests of all parties involved [1]. - The Chinese government urges the U.S. to eliminate the unilateral tariffs imposed on trade partners [1]. Group 3: Future Trade Measures - The Chinese government is aware that the U.S. is preparing to adopt alternative measures, such as trade investigations, to maintain tariffs on trade partners [1]. - The Chinese government will closely monitor these developments and firmly protect its interests [1].