24小时内，特朗普两次全球加税，并敲定访华行程，把赌注下在中国

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses President Trump's recent decision to impose additional tariffs on global imports, raising the rate from 10% to 15%, following a Supreme Court ruling that deemed his previous tariff policy illegal. This move is seen as a continuation of the trade war and reflects Trump's deep understanding of his voter base and the current political landscape [1][3][10]. Group 1: Tariff Policy - Trump announced a 10% import tariff, which was quickly raised to 15%, signaling that the trade war will persist as long as he remains in office [3]. - The increase in tariffs was influenced by the positive market reactions observed after the initial tariff announcement, with significant rises in gold, silver, and the stock market, while the dollar and industrial metals fell [3][10]. - Trump's decision to bypass legal constraints by declaring a national emergency indicates the severity of the fiscal crisis facing the U.S. government [11]. Group 2: Political Context - Trump's actions reflect his steadfast personality and a clear understanding of his supporters, as he remains committed to his initial stance despite legal challenges [6][10]. - The Supreme Court's ruling against Trump's tariff policy highlights a constitutional crisis, as he seeks to address the U.S.'s financial issues through international tariffs rather than domestic tax increases [10][11]. - The upcoming midterm elections are critical for Trump, as failure could lead to diminished power, prompting him to seek significant concessions from China during his planned visit [11]. Group 3: China Relations - Trump's visit to China is viewed as a high-stakes gamble aimed at securing major concessions to alleviate domestic fiscal pressures [11]. - The negotiations with China may involve discussions on arms sales to Taiwan, which Trump hopes to leverage for political gain [11]. - Analysts express skepticism about the success of Trump's strategy, noting that the U.S. lacks the leverage to pressure China effectively, and any attempts at coercive negotiations are likely to fail [11].