特朗普刚说莫迪同意停购俄油，印度转头打脸：我们立场没变！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the conflicting statements between former President Trump and Indian officials regarding India's oil purchasing policy from Russia, highlighting the complexities of international relations and national interests in energy procurement [1][3][5]. Group 1: Trump's Claims and India's Response - Trump claimed that Indian Prime Minister Modi agreed to stop purchasing Russian oil in exchange for a reduction in tariffs on Indian goods from 25% to 18% [1]. - The Indian Ministry of External Affairs later clarified that India's oil procurement policy remains unchanged, emphasizing that national interests guide their decisions [1][3]. Group 2: India's Oil Import Dynamics - India is the world's third-largest oil consumer, relying on imports for approximately 90% of its oil needs, with Russia being a significant supplier [3]. - In January, India's oil imports from Russia were about 1.2 million barrels per day, expected to decrease to 1 million barrels in February and around 800,000 barrels in March, indicating a shift in import strategy under U.S. pressure [3]. Group 3: Russia's Position - Russia's officials stated that they see no reason for India to change its stance on purchasing Russian oil, asserting that it benefits both parties and contributes to the stability of the international energy market [3][5]. - The Russian government expressed willingness to continue close cooperation with India regarding oil supplies [3]. Group 4: India's Strategic Autonomy - India's approach to energy procurement is driven by the principles of supply security, reasonable pricing, and stable sources, indicating a preference for cost-effective and reliable suppliers [3][6]. - The article suggests that India's decision-making power in this context reflects its national interests, demonstrating that reliance on one country does not equate to dependency [6][7].