彻底闹翻！白宫高官扬言“追责”美联储，后者怒怼：你算老几？

Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding the Federal Reserve highlights the tension between political decisions and economic realities, particularly regarding the burden of tariffs on American consumers and businesses [1][5]. Group 1: Tariff Impact - A report from the New York Federal Reserve indicates that approximately 90% of the costs from tariffs imposed by the U.S. government will ultimately be borne by American businesses and consumers [1]. - The report shows that the pass-through rate of tariffs was as high as 94% in the first eight months of the previous year, dropping to 86% by November [1]. - Tariff rates have surged from 2.6% to 13%, with some tariffs on Chinese goods reaching as high as 125% during certain months [1]. Group 2: Federal Reserve Independence - Minneapolis Federal Reserve President Neel Kashkari emphasized that criticisms of the report are attempts to undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve [3]. - The White House's response to the criticism, stating that questioning a specific report does not equate to attacking the Fed's independence, indicates a desire to maintain a degree of separation between political discourse and economic analysis [3]. Group 3: Economic Analysis and Political Pressure - The analysis from the New York Fed aligns with a similar report from the Congressional Budget Office, which concluded that tariffs have raised import prices, with U.S. businesses absorbing 30% of the costs and consumers bearing the remaining 70% [3]. - Critics argue that the focus on potential benefits of tariffs, such as job creation and wage increases, lacks tangible evidence, while the costs are immediate and impactful on consumers [5]. Group 4: Future Implications - The ongoing power struggle in Washington raises concerns about the Federal Reserve's future independence, with potential implications for monetary policy and its alignment with political agendas [5][6]. - The appointment of Kevin Walsh as the new Federal Reserve Chair could lead to significant changes in policy, with the potential for reforms that may not align with economic realities [5][6].