罢免独董引内讧！可靠股份5∶2表决背后，牵出监管旧账与权力之争

Core Viewpoint - The company Reliable Co. announced the dismissal of independent director Jing Naiquan, citing a loss of independence and misconduct, which has led to a governance conflict within the board [1][3][4]. Group 1: Dismissal Announcement - On February 23, Reliable Co. held a board meeting where the resolution to dismiss Jing Naiquan was passed with 5 votes in favor and 2 against [1]. - The board accused Jing of becoming a "representative of specific shareholder interests" and failing to fulfill his duties as an independent director [4][5]. - The decision requires approval from the company's shareholders to be finalized [4]. Group 2: Accusations Against Jing Naiquan - The company detailed specific instances of Jing's alleged misconduct, including inappropriate communication with the company secretary and leaving meetings without permission [6][9]. - Jing was accused of attempting to protect the interests of a specific individual, particularly regarding the controversial remuneration of another director, Bao Jia [5][13]. - Jing's behavior was characterized as a significant deviation from the expected conduct of an independent director, undermining the interests of all shareholders [5][13]. Group 3: Rebuttal from Bao Jia - Bao Jia, who voted against Jing's dismissal, claimed that the accusations were unfounded and a form of retaliation from the controlling shareholder, Jin Liwei [10][12]. - Bao highlighted that Jing had maintained his independence and had previously voted against decisions that conflicted with his professional judgment [12]. - The conflict is further complicated by Bao's previous relationship with Jin, raising questions about the motivations behind the dismissal [10][12]. Group 4: Implications for Corporate Governance - The ongoing conflict within Reliable Co. raises concerns about the company's governance structure and its ability to execute long-term strategies effectively [13]. - The upcoming shareholder meeting on March 12, 2026, will be crucial in determining the future of the board's composition and governance practices [13].