Seek .(US:SKLTY) Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-02-24 01:28Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding Anthropic's claims about other AI companies allegedly using its model for distillation, which has sparked significant debate and skepticism within the AI community [1][14]. Group 1: Controversy and Reactions - Anthropic accused DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax of using 24,000 accounts to interact with its model Claude for 16 million times, leading to a public outcry [1][15]. - The public reaction has been largely critical of Anthropic, with many questioning the legitimacy of its claims and expressing support for the accused companies [2][11]. - Some commentators have drawn parallels to reverse engineering, arguing that paying customers should have the right to use products as they see fit [2][16]. Group 2: Model Distillation Explanation - Model distillation is described as a common method in AI training, aimed at creating smaller, more efficient models by transferring knowledge from larger models [13][31]. - The process involves a large model acting as a teacher, simplifying its knowledge for a smaller model, which can then operate more efficiently on less powerful devices [13][31]. - This technique is essential for making AI applications more accessible and usable on everyday devices, thus lowering operational costs and improving performance [29][31]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The ongoing debate highlights the competitive nature of the AI industry, where companies invest heavily to protect their intellectual property while also facing pressure to democratize technology [14][32]. - The article suggests that defining the boundaries of data usage and balancing copyright protection with innovation will be critical challenges for the industry moving forward [14][32].