商务部回应美最高法院公布关税诉讼案裁决结果

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the government's imposition of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act is illegal, which has significant implications for U.S.-China trade relations [1] Group 1: Tariff Rulings - The Supreme Court's decision on February 20 declared that the tariffs imposed on trade partners, including the fentanyl tariffs, are unlawful [1] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce emphasized that unilateral tariff measures violate international trade rules and U.S. domestic law, and do not serve the interests of any party involved [1] Group 2: Trade Relations - The Chinese side reiterated its stance against unilateral tariff increases, stating that trade wars yield no winners and protectionism is not a viable solution [1] - The Ministry of Commerce urged the U.S. to eliminate the unilateral tariffs imposed on trade partners, highlighting the mutual benefits of cooperation between China and the U.S. [1] Group 3: Future Actions - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce noted that the U.S. is preparing to implement trade investigations as alternative measures to maintain tariffs on trade partners, which will be closely monitored by China [1]