死撑了三天，美国终于低头，这场全球大战，结局真被中国说准了

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Trump's global tariff policy was unconstitutional, invalidating $175 billion in tariffs collected over the past year, which were deemed illegal [3][5][10] Group 1: Legal and Economic Implications - The Supreme Court's decision labeled the tariffs as unconstitutional, leading to the immediate termination of the tariff system that was previously touted as a savior for American manufacturing [3][5] - The ruling necessitates the return of $175 billion in tariffs to thousands of businesses and consumers, highlighting the financial impact of the policy [5][7] - Following the ruling, the average tariff rate on Chinese exports is expected to decrease from 32% to 24%, reducing cost pressures across the Asian supply chain [8][19] Group 2: Political and International Relations - The ruling exposed divisions within the U.S. government, revealing that tax authority lies with Congress, not the President, undermining Trump's approach to trade policy [10][12] - In response to the ruling, the Trump administration proposed a new 15% tariff on all imports under a lesser-known trade law, which negatively impacts U.S. allies like the UK and Australia, raising their tariffs to the same level as competitors [13][15] - This approach has led to a deterioration of U.S. international credibility, as allies realize they could be treated as expendable in U.S. trade policy [17][19] Group 3: Strategic Outcomes - The U.S. is now forced back to the negotiation table, as actions that violate economic principles and legal boundaries ultimately lead to failure [19][21] - China's strategic patience and reform efforts have positioned it favorably in negotiations, while the U.S. finds its negotiating power diminished [21][23] - The trade conflict, initially perceived as a means to gain leverage, has resulted in a situation where the U.S. must confront the consequences of its unilateral actions [23]