特朗普得瑟不下去了，罕见给中国特殊待遇，我商务部通告美国

Group 1 - The recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court declared Trump's tariff policy illegal, highlighting a significant divide between the Trump administration and the U.S. judicial system regarding tariffs [1][3] - The ruling emphasizes that the power to levy taxes belongs to Congress, and any unilateral tariff measures initiated by the President must be approved by Congress, reaffirming the principle of checks and balances in the U.S. Constitution [3][5] - This decision effectively dismantles the legal foundation for Trump's tariff policy during his second term, blocking the rapid implementation of global tariffs based on a state of emergency [5][7] Group 2 - The ruling reflects deep political divisions within the U.S., as businesses and several state governments have long challenged Trump's tariff policies, arguing they harm commercial interests and violate constitutional principles [7] - Despite the ruling, Trump announced plans to implement a new 10% global tariff through the Trade Act of 1974, indicating a persistent commitment to protectionist policies [7] - China's response to the ruling reiterated its opposition to unilateralism and framed Trump's tariff measures as legally invalid, reinforcing its position within the multilateral trade system [7]