特朗普高兴不起来了，罕见给中国“特殊待遇”，我商务部通告美国

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act cannot be used to justify broad tariffs, declaring measures like retaliatory tariffs and fentanyl tariffs illegal, leading to a significant response from the Trump administration, which announced a new 10% import tariff on global goods for 150 days, citing the Trade Act of 1974 as legal backing [1][3]. Group 1: Legal and Political Implications - The ruling highlights the constitutional separation of powers, emphasizing that tax authority belongs to Congress, and the President cannot bypass legislative procedures to impose global tariffs [1]. - The Supreme Court's decision serves to maintain the boundaries of power and prevent the unlimited expansion of executive authority in trade matters [1][7]. Group 2: Economic Impact - The unilateral tariffs have raised raw material costs for domestic companies, squeezing the survival space for small and medium enterprises, ultimately leading to increased prices for ordinary citizens [3]. - The new global tariffs are seen as a temporary measure, indicating the administration's awareness of the significant risks involved, with potential legal battles over tariff refunds expected to last over five years [3]. Group 3: International Reactions - Traditional U.S. trade partners like Canada welcomed the Supreme Court's ruling, while Europe is assessing the policy's impact, signaling a growing global opposition to unilateral trade barriers [3]. - China's Ministry of Commerce responded firmly against the unilateral tariffs, asserting that such measures violate international trade rules and U.S. domestic laws, emphasizing the detrimental effects of protectionism [5][7]. Group 4: Future Trade Dynamics - The Supreme Court's ruling is viewed as a self-correcting mechanism within the U.S. system, potentially stabilizing global trade expectations [7]. - The ongoing trade tensions and the Trump administration's approach may lead to increased global economic volatility and provoke retaliatory measures from other nations, creating a vicious cycle [7].