特斯拉指控法国饮料公司恶意抢注Cybercab商标

Core Viewpoint - Tesla has filed a new appeal with the USPTO against Unibev's use of the "Cybercab" trademark, alleging fraudulent behavior and questioning Unibev's intent due to its lack of history in vehicle manufacturing or sales [1][2]. Group 1: Trademark Dispute - Tesla has raised five objections against Unibev's trademark application, accusing the company of improper conduct [1][2]. - Tesla questions Unibev's intent to use the "Cybercab" trademark, noting that Unibev has no history of manufacturing or selling vehicles [1][2]. - Tesla claims that Unibev's CEO, Jean-Louis Lethal, follows Tesla executives on social media, suggesting he cannot be unaware of Tesla's "Cybercab" plans [1][2]. Group 2: Allegations of Fraud - Tesla asserts that Unibev misled the USPTO by stating that "cyber," "cab," or "cyber cab" had not been used by anyone for similar goods, which Tesla disputes [1][2]. - Tesla indicates that it disclosed the "Cybercab" name in 2024 but failed to file for the trademark in time [1][2]. - Tesla accuses Unibev of attempting to trademark the name to charge Tesla for its use [1][2]. Group 3: Other Trademark Applications - Tesla highlights that Unibev owns other trademarks such as "Teslaquila" and has applied for additional trademarks including "Cyberquad" and "Cybertaxi" [1][2].