中美局势要变天！莫迪通知全球，对美打响第一枪，携30多国齐上阵

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration were illegal, undermining the legal basis for using tariffs as a tool for international pressure [3][7][9]. Group 1: Legal and Political Implications - The Supreme Court's decision effectively dismantled the legal foundation of the "tariff stick" that Trump used to pressure other countries, declaring that the use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) for imposing tariffs was an overreach of presidential authority [5][9]. - Following the ruling, the White House attempted to invoke the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a new 10% tariff on all imports, which was quickly raised to 15%, but this measure has a built-in time limitation of 150 days without Congressional approval [11][13]. Group 2: International Reactions - Countries began to reassess their trade relationships with the U.S. after the legal ruling, with India being the first to publicly clarify that its energy procurement policies would not change due to U.S. pressure [16][18]. - India canceled a planned trade delegation to the U.S., indicating a shift in negotiations and a desire to reassess previously agreed terms under duress from U.S. tariffs [20][22]. Group 3: Economic Impact - The U.S. GDP growth rate for 2025 is projected at only 2.2%, with households bearing the burden of tariffs, averaging an additional cost of $1,700 per family due to increased prices on various goods [25][27]. - Industries reliant on global supply chains, such as semiconductors and automotive manufacturing, faced significant layoffs due to rising costs from tariffs, with over 80,000 jobs lost in 2025 [27]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The U.S. Trade Representative expressed concerns about China potentially taking advantage of the situation, reflecting a sense of vulnerability in U.S. trade policy [29][30]. - The upcoming expiration of the temporary tariff measures and the potential for high-level talks between the U.S. and China will be critical in determining the future of U.S. trade policy and its global standing [34].