特朗普没法继续嘚瑟，给中方罕见特殊待遇，中方再次通告美国

Group 1 - The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against the legality of certain tariffs imposed by the Trump administration, significantly weakening the White House's ability to use tariffs as a tool for pressure [3][5] - The ruling emphasizes that the power to levy taxes is constitutionally granted to Congress, not the President, thereby restricting the executive's ability to unilaterally impose tariffs [3][5] - Despite the court's decision, the U.S. retains the ability to impose tariffs on China under Section 301, maintaining a 25% tariff rate, and other specific tariffs on steel and aluminum products remain in place [5][7] Group 2 - China's response to the U.S. tariffs has been measured, with the Ministry of Commerce reiterating its opposition to unilateral tariff measures and emphasizing that trade conflicts yield no winners [7][8] - The Chinese stance highlights the contradiction in U.S. policy, where the U.S. claims to uphold international rules while simultaneously employing unilateral tariffs, which have now been legally challenged [7][8] - The ruling reflects the internal checks and balances within the U.S. system, indicating that while protectionism is deeply rooted in American society, there are legal constraints on executive power [7][8]