美国加税失效，要给中国企业退钱，特朗普不甘失败，中方的回应亮了

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on February 20, 2026, declared the additional tariffs imposed by the Trump administration unconstitutional, leading to the potential refund of approximately $130 billion in tariffs to various countries, including China [1][3]. Group 1: Economic Impact - The ruling signifies a major shift in the economic landscape, challenging the effectiveness of Trump's tax policies and highlighting the legal and political uncertainties associated with unilateral trade actions [1][3]. - The average tariff rate on China remains lower than before Trump's policies, indicating that China has emerged as a winner in this scenario [3]. - The refund of $130 billion poses significant financial implications for the U.S. government, representing not only a fiscal loss but also a potential political setback as midterm elections approach [3][7]. Group 2: Political Ramifications - The Supreme Court's decision undermines Trump's negotiating power and complicates his political standing within the Republican Party, especially as he faces criticism and potential division among party members [3][7]. - The ruling has prompted a strong response from China, emphasizing the futility of protectionist measures and the need for mutual cooperation in trade [5]. - Trump's potential attempts to invoke new tariffs under the Trade Act of 1974 may further complicate U.S.-China relations, as both sides navigate the aftermath of the ruling [7]. Group 3: Future Trade Relations - The future of U.S.-China trade relations remains uncertain, with the need for deeper dialogue based on mutual benefits highlighted as essential to avoid further economic conflicts [7]. - The ruling serves as a reminder of the limitations of unilateral policies in a globalized economy, suggesting that collaborative efforts are necessary for achieving sustainable trade outcomes [7].